San Francisco vs Chiang Mai
Side-by-side comparison for digital nomads
Overall Winner
Chiang Mai
65/100
Cheapest
Chiang Mai
$593/mo
Fastest Internet
San Francisco
173 Mbps
Safest
Chiang Mai
65/100
| San Francisco | Chiang Mai | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 59/100 | 65/100 |
| Monthly Budget | $3,113 | $593 |
| Rent (1BR Centre) | $2,182 | $358 |
| Download Speed | 173 Mbps | 60 Mbps |
| Upload Speed | 54 Mbps | 26 Mbps |
| Safety Score | 64/100 | 65/100 |
| Healthcare | 74/100 | 70/100 |
| Walkability | 76/100 | 42/100 |
| Nightlife | 73/100 | 47/100 |
| Cheap Meal | $16 | $3 |
| Coffee | $7 | $2 |
| Coworking (monthly) | $263 | $43 |
Verdict: San Francisco vs Chiang Mai
Chiang Mai edges ahead with an overall score of 65/100.
Choose San Francisco if you prioritise lower costs. Choose Chiang Mai if you prioritise overall quality.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is San Francisco or Chiang Mai better for digital nomads?
Chiang Mai scores higher overall (65/100 vs 59/100). However, Chiang Mai is cheaper at $593/month.
Which is cheaper, San Francisco or Chiang Mai?
Chiang Mai is cheaper at $593/month vs $3,113/month for a comfortable lifestyle.
Which has faster internet, San Francisco or Chiang Mai?
San Francisco has faster internet at 173 Mbps vs 60 Mbps download.
Which is safer, San Francisco or Chiang Mai?
Chiang Mai has a higher safety score (65/100 vs 64/100).